Methods scientific dating Free mobile ebony sex chat
Later, this date was confirmed by two other dating methods (paleomagnetism and fission tracks), and was widely accepted.Then Richard Leakey found a skull (called KNM-ER 1470) the KBS tuff, a skull that looked far too modern to be 3 million years old.Of course, the further you go back in history the greater your statistical errors will be... And you can make the result come out to anything you like depending on the assumptions that you make.but combining several dating methods with fossils and evo-devo approach should give one an acceptably accurate idea of when something existed - at least the order of magnitude would be trustworthy (look at the example they gave underneath... Further, comparing results based on one set of assumptions with results based on another set of assumptions does not make the results objective.So, for you to ask to identify a non-Christian scientist who has provided evidence for a young earth is a contradiction in terms.It's like asking to identify an atheist who argues for the existence of God.It amazes me that I still hear all the regular mantras I heard in college as an unbeliever, "all real scientists believe in [macro] evolution." Groupthink is alive and well. ) Hi David, It seems that you have missed the point.This water dropping into a cylinder - explanation to refute dating was quite "simple" indeed. beforehand there were others who found 2.61 and 3 mill..... at least one would then assume with some confidence it should have occured between 1 and 4 million years ago... All dating methods are based on assumptions about age, not measurements of age.
And while we call the assumptions behind the long-age evolutionary creation myth into question, we also provide an alternative.For example, if you do not accept dendrochronology as an accurate method or radio carbon dating which method do you accept and and on what grounds.Also, can you identify a non Christian scientist who has provided scientific evidence for a young earth. Dear Bob, The only reliable way of knowing the age of anything is by the historical method, by eyewitnesses.Which illustrates that, contrary to popular belief, the dating methods are not the primary way that ages are decided. Their results are always ‘interpreted’ to agree with other factors, such as the evolutionary interpretation of geology and fossils.Could you please provide details of a more accurate scientific method of dating which can tell us the age of the earth more accurately than current scientific methods.
Search for methods scientific dating:
Tests by other scientists using paleomagnetism and fission tracks confirmed the lower date.