Define radioactive dating of fossils Camsexchat no bs free
With this in mind, if George and Mary had existed 100,000 years ago, it is safe to say that humans should have built the B-2 bomber 90,000 years ago (being generous, as always, to the theory of evolution).As far as the evolution debate is concerned, this aspect of the debate is so complex and so affected by pre-conceived notions (such as the fact that many dinosaur fossils are dated according to their location on the phylogenetic tree), that for all practical purposes, dating techniques cannot be used as a proof for evolution or as a proof for creation science.Considering that modern dating methods are corrupted by known flaws in radiometric dating; by techniques which are known to be based on an assumption that the theory of evolution is a fact; and by other flawed techniques, it is clear that the dating of bones, fossils, etc. the issue cannot differentiate between the theory of evolution and creation science).Radiometric dating (often called radioactive dating) is a way to find out how old something is.The method compares the amount of a naturally occurring radioactive isotope and its decay products, in samples. It is the main way to learn the age of rocks and other geological features, including the age of the Earth itself.
A particular isotope of a particular element is called a nuclide. That is, at some point in time, an atom of such a nuclide will spontaneously change into a different nuclide by radioactive decay.
It shows the age of the sample, and the original composition.
The method works best if neither the parent nuclide nor the daughter product enters or leaves the material after its formation.
It is therefore essential to have as much information as possible about the material being dated and to check for possible signs of alteration.
Measurements should be taken on samples from different parts of the rock body.